The
final few Chapters of Brave New World are a flurry of action and the
thought behind the morality of the society, which begs the question of who can
tell what is right for a person or a society. After Linda’s death, John, in a
fit of rage, tries to liberate the society, and is captured by the police. He
is brought to the Controller of Europe and gets in a discussion over
literature, God, and rights. The controller argues that God may exist, but that
he isn’t conducive to their society of production and as such they have removed
God in the favor to seek perpetual happiness. John says that God is necessary,
and should be given to the people, because he tells people their morals of chastity
and the like. He also argues that God and the old way are necessary, because it
teaches people to live through the their troubles, not to give up or find the
way of least resistance John rather have the hardships and misery that goes
with life than take the route of civilization and purge emotion and use
scientific unnatural means to be unnaturally happy. This discussion of morals
and the roles of God made me think of who can call what is right and wrong to
do. Both of these people thought their way was best and thought everyone else
should follow it as the best course of action, but who can make that decision.
Because as an outsider in the 21st century, who is agnostic, I
agreed more with the scientific controller who rely on God and thought
scientific advances were good for society, but I also thought it wasn’t
perfect. I also felt that it didn’t have the right to control everyone and make
the decision for them. The old society wasn’t much better with its pain,
violence, and unhappiness, as John willingly takes pain as well as doles out
violence. I thought this turn of events was interesting for the novel. In most
dystopian novels, while they admit the mistakes of the old society, they tend
to romanticize them and want to go back to the old ways. This book however is
different. Brave New World makes both societies out as terrible, one is
controlled using psychology and the other is full of violence and misery.
Neither one is preferable, but each thinks theirs is better, telling the
audience that no society is perfect and no one can accurately make a choice for
everyone else. All dystopian novels do this to a degree, but I think this novel
does the best at demonstrating this to the audience, through the ending
discussion and events.
Thursday, May 9, 2013
The Conclusion
The conclusion of Brave New World is in many ways more ambiguous than the rest of the novel. For the most part. I thought that Huxley's writing was straightforward and to the point, which mirrored the scientific precision of the society itself. The final chapter centers on John and his struggle with civilization. Disheartened by Linda's death and his conversation with Mond, it seemed to me as if John had lost all hope for returning to the "savage" way of life that he had been used to. He began to use soma as a way of numbing his discontent. From that point on, the book takes a rather dark turn. As Christian mentioned, the majority of the novel features characters who are happy with the society. Most of the plots are relatively light - love triangles, golf outings, etc. At the same time, in a society where free will has been eliminated, there is obviously going to be some heavy undertones throughout the book. The final chapter of the book is a sudden release of all of the negative implications of the society. The climactic scene of John's violent outburst against Lenina followed by the mass orgy seemed to demonstrate the worst elements of Huxley's world. People lose their bodies and their identities to become part of the greater oppressive power. It is so unbearable that John pays the ultimate price by taking his life. The final paragraph of the novel is haunting. Huxley describes John's feet as he hangs. He uses the cardinal directions of a compass to evoke a detachment from the scene. The reader is reminded of the clinical nature of the society itself as if to say that civilization will go on in its dystopian state despite the damage done to John.
Thursday, May 2, 2013
Everyone Isn't Happy?
At first when reading Brave New World, I got the idea that most people were happy except for the few rare exceptions, such as Bernard. After reading 12 chapters, it seems that as a reader you are discovering more and more people who are unhappy. These people do not tell others that they are unhappy, however. One example is Lenina. Lenina seems to like John a lot, but no matter what she does Lenina cannot express these emotions with him. In this society, you are not supposed to like only one person. Lenina has not expressed these feelings to anyone else yet which has allowed her to maintain a high social level. She has been with several higher up males, but she has still only wanted John.
When people in this society start to feel emotions other than happiness, they turn to soma. They go on soma holidays where they only feel happiness, but are in a coma so they cannot interact with real people. The length of these soma holidays differ; sometimes they are only for an hour or two, and other times people go on them for days. Linda is currently expected to be in her soma holiday for 30 days. In our society, if someone were to take a drug and it knocked them out for hours on end, the person would have a major problem and would need to get help. In Brave New World, it is normal and if you were not to go on soma holidays, then you would have a problem and you would need to get help in order to fit back into society. It is interesting how Huxley turned this social norm around. The 1930's was probably a time when drugs were becoming an issue and Huxley wanted to take this issue and show what life might be like if drugs were to take over a part of society. It seems that Huxley has taken a lot of themes of what was happening in the 1930's and took them to the extreme, such as with the conveyor belt.
When people in this society start to feel emotions other than happiness, they turn to soma. They go on soma holidays where they only feel happiness, but are in a coma so they cannot interact with real people. The length of these soma holidays differ; sometimes they are only for an hour or two, and other times people go on them for days. Linda is currently expected to be in her soma holiday for 30 days. In our society, if someone were to take a drug and it knocked them out for hours on end, the person would have a major problem and would need to get help. In Brave New World, it is normal and if you were not to go on soma holidays, then you would have a problem and you would need to get help in order to fit back into society. It is interesting how Huxley turned this social norm around. The 1930's was probably a time when drugs were becoming an issue and Huxley wanted to take this issue and show what life might be like if drugs were to take over a part of society. It seems that Huxley has taken a lot of themes of what was happening in the 1930's and took them to the extreme, such as with the conveyor belt.
Inclusion in Society
Unlike The Road or The Handmaid’s Tale, where
everyone seems to be discontent and separated from each other, for most of the
inhabitants of Brave New World, it seems to be the opposite. In The Handmaid’s
Tale designated into roles, and everyone resented their roles, and the
stereotypical roles of other, the economy wives, and the blue-wearing wives
hate the handmaids, and to an extent the handmaids hate the wives and the
commanders. Everyone hates their role. But in Brave New World, most of
the people seem to be for the most part content in their roles. The people are
conditioned for their roles in society, to make them the best at it and to make
them somewhat happy. They are also conditioned in their sleep through little
phrases to love their own role and society, and dislike the other roles, but at
the same time, they are programmed to acknowledge that every rank has a place
in society and should be respected. While this hierarchy of preprograming one
person to be better than another in size or intelligence in unfair, the
conditioning seems to work. Most of the people feel content working, playing
golf, and so on, as they all feel they are a part of the norm and are a part of
everyone else, or at least, they are made to feel that way. Then there are
outsiders such as Bernard, who may have had alcohol put in his decanting
bottle, and as a result he is an alpha with stunted growth and weaker
conditioning. He doesn’t like golf, he doesn’t like how he holds less authority
then the other alphas, and he hates how relationships are so open. Because of
these things he is an outsider and dislikes the society, criticizing it and
trying to be an individual of his choosing. But when he finds The Savage, and
everyone now is polite to him because they want to meet John, he still criticizes
the society to a degree, but he is also happy enjoying the privileges he never
had before. He enjoys how people now listen to him, and how he can get any girl
he wants. He uses the savage to get over six different girls in a week, and he
used to hate promiscuity. Now he revels in it. This change in heart in Bernard
seems to suggest that as long as a society makes people feel included, the
people will be content with their society and behave.
I know
Lanina’s new behavior regarding her sadness over not having John goes against
this, as she is discontent despite her sudden fame and inclusion in elite
activities, but I think the point of inclusion is still worth mentioning.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)